Understanding the Governing Documents 1
by Daniel Edstrom
Wall Street financial engineering is a thing to behold. Of course most of it is in complex legal terms difficult to comprehend. Let’s take a look at a few definitions in a Prospectus Supplement and break them down. This is from the RASC Series 2005-EMX4 Trust put out by GMAC.
Subordination. So long as the Class M Certificates remain outstanding, losses on the mortgage loans which are not covered by amounts payable under excess cash flow or overcollateralization will be allocated to the Class M Certificates that remain outstanding with the lowest payment priority, and the other classes of certificates will not bear any portion of such losses. If none of the Class M Certificates are outstanding, all such losses will be allocated to the Class A Certificates as described in this prospectus supplement.
What this means: Numerous classes of certificates are issued. In this trust the Class A certificates are paid in priority first while any losses first come out of the Class M certificates. Once the Class A certificates principal is paid in full, the principal is applied to the Class M certificates. Once the Class M certificates absorb all losses and the principal is reduced to zero, the Class A certificates will suffer losses. The diagram to the left shows what this looks like. Is there a loss? Only if the loss is not covered by “amounts payable under excess cash flow” or “overcollateralization.”
DEBT SERVICE REDUCTION–Modifications of the terms of a mortgage loan resulting from a bankruptcy proceeding, including a reduction in the amount of the monthly payment on the related mortgage loan, but not any permanent forgiveness of principal.
What this means: A reduction in the monthly payment based on a bankruptcy ruling but not including any permanent principal forgiveness. This doesn’t mean much at the moment but we will revisit this shortly.
Realized Loss–As to any defaulted mortgage loan that is finally liquidated the portion of the Stated Principal Balance plus accrued and unpaid interest remaining after application of all amounts recovered, net of amounts reimbursable to the master servicer for related Advances, Servicing Advances and other expenses, towards interest and principal owing on the mortgage loan. For a mortgage loan the principal balance of which has been reduced in connection with bankruptcy proceedings, the amount of the reduction. As to any mortgage loan that has been the subject of a Debt Service Reduction, the amount of the reduction. For a mortgage loan that has been modified, following a default or if a default was reasonably foreseeable, the amount of principal that has been forgiven, the amount by which a monthly payment has been reduced due to a reduction of the interest rate, and any Servicing Advances that are forgiven and reimbursable to the master servicer or servicer. To the extent the master servicer receives Subsequent Recoveries with respect to any mortgage loan, the amount of the Realized Loss with respect to that mortgage loan will be reduced to the extent such recoveries are received.
What this means: This is part of the Wall Street engineering genius that is difficult to understand. Basically what it is saying is that despite what you might believe, despite what a judge rules in bankruptcy, and despite the fact that a loan modification has been applied to a loan, the investors receive the original payment of principal and interest. Even after a ruling by a standing bankruptcy judge the investors receive the original principal and interest based upon the original note (or at least the copy of the note allegedly pooled into the trust). One can only imagine the book-keeping nightmares that servicers face keeping multiple sets of books and trying to keep them all straight. This is my best guess as to why the servicers have such a hard time keeping the accounting straight for those in bankruptcy. Just ask O. Max Gardner III how often the servicers mess up bankruptcy rulings.
Read all of the above again. Even if the principal and interest payment are reduced in bankruptcy, the servicer is required to advance the principal and interest of the original mortgage loan as amortized. Once the loan is liquidated (paid off), the principal loss is calculated at that time and advances which have not been paid by other forms of credit enhancements are paid back to the advancing party. THE INVESTORS GET THEIR MONEY during the course of the loan (whether or not paid by the homeowners), then it gets ripped out of their hands all at once when the loss is calculated. But you never know for sure whether the investors will actually suffer a loss or if the credit enhancements will pay for it. This is one of many reasons why the homeowner is entitled to a full accounting.
Bankruptcy judges be warned: Wall Street takes your rulings with a grain of salt and applies them in their own fashion. This can only stem from multiple sets of books that are concealed, misrepresented and not disclosed to the courts.
Disclaimer Reminder: This is a blog for educational and informational use only and does not constitute legal advice. Take no action without first consulting an attorney in your jurisdiction.
Mr. Pennell goes on to give a professional analysis of the Frankenstein (MERS) process. Which can only be described as completely out of control. It is of significance to note that the very entities that created and brought forth Frankenstein are governed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It is just as important to note that Frankenstein is NOT governed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, nor governed by federal, state or county land recordation laws. The OCC requires that national banks have “effective risk management procedures and internal controls to conduct the activities safely and soundly.” It is apparent to everyone except OCC that this is not and has not been the case (i.e. rampant industry standards of notary violations, no personal knowledge, forgery, perjury, etc). It is also apparent that the national banks are using other entities such as Frankenstein and foreclosure mills such as the Stern Law Firm and Dolan Media (NDEx West) to perpetuate these activities. Dolan Media specifically states to their investors they are proudly not involved in the robo-signing fiasco (notary violations, no personal knowledge, forgery, etc). If Mr. Pennell did an analysis of the shoddy work done by Dolan Media he would find that they give Frankenstein a run for its money. What I want to emphasize though is that Frankenstein, because of the very nature of its work, is required to have “effective risk management procedures and internal controls to conduct activities safely and soundly.” But this was the OPPOSITE of the INTENT of the parties when they created this monster in their laboratories. I can still hear the echos of their diabolical laughter. As a side note, see Fred Smith explain why Frankenstein (MERS) was involved: http://livinglies.wordpress.com/2011/01/23/fred-smith-explains-why-mers-was-involved-multiple-securitizations/
